Walsh v. Henning
This text of 16 A.D.2d 707 (Walsh v. Henning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for an accounting, and for Other relief, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 23, 1961, which denied his motion, made under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out as insufficient in law the affirmative defense of the Statutes of Limitations and the Statutes of Fraud contained in paragraphs three to eight of defendants’ answers. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur. [31 Misc 2d 871.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 707, 227 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-henning-nyappdiv-1962.