Walsh v. Henning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walsh v. Henning

16 A.D.2d 707, 227 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10112

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 1962·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action for an accounting, and for Other relief, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 23, 1961, which denied his motion, made under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out as insufficient in law the affirmative defense of the Statutes of Limitations and the Statutes of Fraud contained in paragraphs three to eight of defendants’ answers. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur. [31 Misc 2d 871.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for an accounting, and for Other relief, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 23, 1961, which denied his motion, made under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike out as insufficient in law the affirmative defense of the Statutes of Limitations and the Statutes of Fraud contained in paragraphs three to eight of defendants’ answers. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur. [31 Misc 2d 871.]

Walsh v. Henning, 16 A.D.2d 707, 227 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

16 A.D.2d 707 (Walsh v. Henning) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related