Walsh v. Harris

California Supreme Court

Walsh v. Harris

10 Cal. 391

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 391 (Walsh v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walsh v. Harris, 10 Cal. 391 (Cal. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., concurring.

Suit in May, 1856; judgment in October, 1856.

The Court erred in refusing to admit testimony offered by plaintiffs to show that the water alleged in this suit is the same water for which a recovery was had in former cases between the present plaintiffs and the parties under whom the defendants claimed. There was no other means than by parol to establish this fact; and for this error the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., concurring.

Suit in May, 1856; judgment in October, 1856.

The Court erred in refusing to admit testimony offered by plaintiffs to show that the water alleged in this suit is the same water for which a recovery was had in former cases between the present plaintiffs and the parties under whom the defendants claimed. There was no other means than by parol to establish this fact; and for this error the judgment is reversed, and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Cal. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-harris-cal-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack