Walsh v. French
This text of 409 So. 2d 1131 (Walsh v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a non-final order denying a petition for preliminary injunction. We affirm.
Appellant has failed to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion in denying his petition for temporary injunction. Appellant failed to establish the essential criteria for a preliminary injunction, to wit: (1) irreparable harm; (2) a clear legal right; and (3) an inadequate remedy at law. Dania Jai-Alai International, Inc. v. Murua, 375 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); State Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Artis, 345 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
The order denying plaintiff’s petition for temporary injunction is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 So. 2d 1131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-french-fladistctapp-1982.