Walsh v. French

409 So. 2d 1131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19214
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1982·No. No. 81-612·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a non-final order denying a petition for preliminary injunction. We affirm.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate the trial court abused its discretion in denying his petition for temporary injunction. Appellant failed to establish the essential criteria for a preliminary injunction, to wit: (1) irreparable harm; (2) a clear legal right; and (3) an inadequate remedy at law. Dania Jai-Alai International, Inc. v. Murua, 375 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); State Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Artis, 345 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

The order denying plaintiff’s petition for temporary injunction is affirmed.

BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walsh v. French, 409 So. 2d 1131, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19214 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

409 So. 2d 1131 (Walsh v. French) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. Gordon
442 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Gruder v. Gruder
433 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)