Walsh v. Erie Railroad

235 A.D. 747

This text of 235 A.D. 747 (Walsh v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. Erie Railroad, 235 A.D. 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment dismissing the complaint without prejudice, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. While the trial court properly ruled that negligence of the defendant had not been established under the evidence adduced, nevertheless a continuance of the trial asked for at folio 397 should have been granted in view of the unpreparedness of the plaintiff’s attorney by reason of his being so recently brought into the case, which fact was made known to the court with greater particularity in an application made before the trial was begun. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-erie-railroad-nyappdiv-1932.