Walsh v. Downs

3 Dem. Sur. 202
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Dem. Sur. 202 (Walsh v. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. Downs, 3 Dem. Sur. 202 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

The Surrogate.

Counsel for the respondent, Downs, claims that this petition is insufficient, because its allegations, which are wholly upon information and belief, do not state the sources of the petitioner’s information, or the grounds of his belief. In proceedings of this character, I think that such averments are unnecessary. The Surrogate may direct a citation to issue, and parties cited to be examined, whenever he is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for the inquiry; and he may properly be satisfied of that fact by allegations, on the part of the petitioner, of any circumstances which tend to show that property of a decedent’s estate is in the possession or under the control of the respondent, and that too, whether the petitioner positively alleges the existence of such facts, or merely avows his belief of their existence because of information received by him from sources that he fails to reveal.

The citation has properly issued, and the respondents must appear for examination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Dem. Sur. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-downs-nysurct-1884.