Walsh v. Cascone

101 A.D.3d 706, 954 N.Y.2d 488

Opinion

The defendant met her prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendant established, prima facie, that the plaintiffs injuries were not caused by the subject accident (cf. Jilani v Palmer, 83 AD3d 786, 787 [2011]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff Submitted evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to whether the alleged injury to his right shoulder was caused by the subject accident (see Perl v Meher, 18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]; Sforza v Big Guy Leasing Corp., 51 AD3d 659, 661 [2008]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walsh v. Cascone, 101 A.D.3d 706, 954 N.Y.2d 488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

101 A.D.3d 706 (Walsh v. Cascone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.
774 N.E.2d 1197 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Perl v. Meher
960 N.E.2d 424 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
Gaddy v. Eyler
591 N.E.2d 1176 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Sforza v. Big Guy Leasing Corp.
51 A.D.3d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Jilani v. Palmer
83 A.D.3d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)