Walsh v. Brooklyn Elevated Railroad
This text of 27 N.Y.S. 605 (Walsh v. Brooklyn Elevated Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff an injunction unless the defendants pay $500 for damages to the fee of plaintiff’s property. Under the decisions of the court of appeals the trial court should have found that plaintiff’s easements in the street, of light, air, and access, were, in themselves, only of nominal value. Bookman v. Railroad Co., 137 N. Y. 302, 33 N. E. 333. But the failure to so find nowise affected the judgment. The court found as a matter of fact that the abutting premises [606]*606were worth $500 less than they would have been had plaintiff’s-easements not been taken. This was the correct rule oí damage. For that $500, judgment was given, and no award was made for the easements, in themselves. There was evidence that justified the finding, and it should not be disturbed. Judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 N.Y.S. 605, 76 Hun 24, 83 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 24, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-brooklyn-elevated-railroad-nysupct-1894.