Walsh v. Bank of Moundville

132 So. 51, 24 Ala. App. 184, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 314
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 18, 1930
Docket2 Div. 409.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 So. 51 (Walsh v. Bank of Moundville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. Bank of Moundville, 132 So. 51, 24 Ala. App. 184, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 314 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinions

So far as we can see, the identical questions are involved here that were involved in the case of Bank of Moundville v. Carrie K. Walsh, 216 Ala. 116, 112 So. 438, and the facts are likewise identical in the two cases. The trial, from the judgment in which this appeal is taken, appears to have been conducted in all respects in accordance with the law as laid down in the opinion in the case of Bank of Moundville v. Carrie K. Walsh, supra. Obviously, there is no alternative for us but to affirm the judgment of the lower court Code 1923, § 7318. And it is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walsh v. Bank of Moundville
164 So. 391 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 51, 24 Ala. App. 184, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-bank-of-moundville-alactapp-1930.