Walsh v. Bank of Moundville

132 So. 51, 24 Ala. App. 184, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 314
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 1930·No. 2 Div. 409.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

So far as we can see, the identical questions are involved here that were involved in the case of Bank of Moundville v. Carrie K. Walsh, 216 Ala. 116, 112 So. 438, and the facts are likewise identical in the two cases. The trial, from the judgment in which this appeal is taken, appears to have been conducted in all respects in accordance with the law as laid down in the opinion in the case of Bank of Moundville v. Carrie K. Walsh, supra. Obviously, there is no alternative for us but to affirm the judgment of the lower court Code 1923, § 7318. And it is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walsh v. Bank of Moundville, 132 So. 51, 24 Ala. App. 184, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 314 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

132 So. 51 (Walsh v. Bank of Moundville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walsh v. Bank of Moundville
164 So. 391 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)