Walser v. Wear

31 S.W. 37, 128 Mo. 652, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMay 21, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 31 S.W. 37 (Walser v. Wear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walser v. Wear, 31 S.W. 37, 128 Mo. 652, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 59 (Mo. 1895).

Opinion

Gantt, P. J. —

This is an appeal from the circuit court of Barton county, Missouri. Respondent insists the appeal should be dismissed or the judgment affirmed for failure to comply with rules 11, 12 and 13 of this court, for the reason that appellant has failed to file a proper abstract of the record. The cause is here simply on a certificate of judgment and the order allowing an appeal.

The appellant, at great cost, has filed a printed volume of some six hundred and six pages, but it is not indexed, and can not be sustained as a compliance with rule 14.

This printed volume does not contain the record proper, save an occasional reference thereto in the bill of exceptions. There is no record proper here outside of the certificate of judgment and appeal, and we have repeatedly ruled that the recitals in the bill of exceptions will not supply the record proper. State v. Harris, 121 Mo. 445.

There is no certificate by the clerk to the volume of evidence filed, nor is there any indorsement thereon indicating that it is intended as an abstract of the record and certainly it would be a clear misnomer to so style it.

For failure to comply with rule 13, the appeal is dismissed.

Burgess and Sherwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. White
288 S.W. 18 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1926)
Herman Savings Bank v. Kropp
181 S.W. 86 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)
Southern Missouri & Arkansas Railroad v. Wyatt
122 S.W. 688 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Flanagan Milling Co. v. City of St. Louis
121 S.W. 112 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Philips v. City of Webb
108 S.W. 593 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Harding v. Bedoll
100 S.W. 638 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1907)
Bower v. Daniel
95 S.W. 347 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
State v. Walker
91 S.W. 899 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
School District No. 1 v. Boyle
88 S.W. 136 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Williams v. Harris
85 S.W. 643 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Bick v. Williams
80 S.W. 885 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
City of St. Charles ex rel. Budd v. Deemar
73 S.W. 469 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1903)
Lucas v. Huff
92 Mo. App. 369 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Clements v. Turner
63 S.W. 84 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
Bates v. Ruth & Mengal Realty Co.
88 Mo. App. 550 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Burdick v. Security Life Ass'n
86 Mo. App. 94 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1900)
Western Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Glasner
52 S.W. 237 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Lawson v. Mills
51 S.W. 678 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Ricketts v. Hart
51 S.W. 825 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Halstead v. Stone
49 S.W. 850 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 S.W. 37, 128 Mo. 652, 1895 Mo. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walser-v-wear-mo-1895.