Walser 799054 v. Corrigan
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION DALTON WALSER, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:19-cv-116 v. HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY J. CORRIGAN, et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ ORDERADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Corrigan and Dunton filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on July 23, 2020, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment.1 The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
1Defendants Theut, Horton, and Spiker were dismissed by prior order (ECF No. 5). 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6thCir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007). A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Dated: August 28, 2020 /s/ Paul L. Maloney Paul L. Maloney United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walser 799054 v. Corrigan (Walser 799054 v. Corrigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.