WALPOLE WOODWORKERS, INC. v. Manning

17 A.3d 476, 300 Conn. 940, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 159
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 20, 2011
DocketSC 18778
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.3d 476 (WALPOLE WOODWORKERS, INC. v. Manning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WALPOLE WOODWORKERS, INC. v. Manning, 17 A.3d 476, 300 Conn. 940, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 159 (Colo. 2011).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 126 Conn. App. 94 (AC 31447), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*941 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18778. David L. Gussak, in support of the petition. Decided April 20, 2011
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a contractor who has violated the Home Improvement Act (act), General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 20-429 et seq., may recover the balance due under the contract as the ‘reasonable value’ of its services under the ‘bad faith’ exception of the act?”
EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walpole Woodworkers, Inc. v. Manning
11 A.3d 165 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.3d 476, 300 Conn. 940, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walpole-woodworkers-inc-v-manning-conn-2011.