Walpole v. Polymer Plastics Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walpole v. Polymer Plastics Corp.

205 A.D.2d 682, 614 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6452

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 682 (Walpole v. Polymer Plastics Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walpole v. Polymer Plastics Corp., 205 A.D.2d 682, 614 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (DiTucci, J.), dated June 23, 1992, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the defendants Polymer Plastics Corp. and Vitricon, Inc., to dismiss the complaint for lack of in personam jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[683]*683The record supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendants were not properly served with process. Accordingly, we will not disturb that determination (see, e.g., Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest., 169 AD2d 829). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (DiTucci, J.), dated June 23, 1992, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the defendants Polymer Plastics Corp. and Vitricon, Inc., to dismiss the complaint for lack of in personam jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[683]*683The record supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendants were not properly served with process. Accordingly, we will not disturb that determination (see, e.g., Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest., 169 AD2d 829). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 682, 614 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walpole-v-polymer-plastics-corp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack