Walpin v. Heffernan

New York Supreme Court

Walpin v. Heffernan

197 Misc. 989, 99 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1957

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 10, 1950

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 Misc. 989 (Walpin v. Heffernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walpin v. Heffernan, 197 Misc. 989, 99 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1957 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Di Falco, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law for an order declaring as valid the designating petitions filed by petitioner for nomination in the Democratic party primaries for the public office of member of Assembly, Third Assembly District, County of Bronx, City of New York, and for additional relief.

The preliminary objections raised by respondent objector are overruled as the necessary parties to the proceeding were served with process (Matter of Swan v. Cohen, 179 Misc. 69, affd. 262 App. Div. 956, affd. 286 N. Y. 678). The cases cited by respondent objector involve proceedings to invalidate designating petitions and are not applicable.

In October, 1949, at the time of registration petitioner enrolled as a Democrat. Early in July, 1950, his claim to be a Democrat was challenged and on July 7th proceedings were initiated by the Democratic party county committee of Bronx County, and after a hearing a determination was made; thereafter a proceeding was duly instituted to cancel the enrollment. This proceeding [990]*990came on to be heard in this court and a decision and order was made and entered as hereafter more fully appears.

In the interim petitioner Walpin on July 18, 1950, caused to be filed a designating petition purporting to designate him as a candidate for nomination of the Democratic party for the office of member of Assembly, Third Assembly District, County of Bronx, to be voted for at the primary election to be held on August 22, 1950.

On July 21,1950, an objection was duly filed to said designating petition. On July 27th specifications were duly filed with the board of elections setting forth among other things that the petitioner was not validly enrolled as a member of the Democratic party.

Mr. Justice Rabin found that the said Walpin was not a duly enrolled Democrat and canceled his enrollment as a member of the Democratic party. (Matter of Mendelsohn v. Walpin, 197 Misc. 993.) The decision of Mr. Justice Rabin is controlling and is binding upon the parties and on this court. Accordingly as the petitioner, Walpin, is not such a person as is qualified to file a valid petition under subdivision 1 of section 137 of the Election Law, and the petition filed for the purpose of designating him as a candidate for a party nomination at the Democratic primary is invalid, the relief demanded by the petitioner must be and is in all respects denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Di Falco, J.

This is a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law for an order declaring as valid the designating petitions filed by petitioner for nomination in the Democratic party primaries for the public office of member of Assembly, Third Assembly District, County of Bronx, City of New York, and for additional relief.

The preliminary objections raised by respondent objector are overruled as the necessary parties to the proceeding were served with process (Matter of Swan v. Cohen, 179 Misc. 69, affd. 262 App. Div. 956, affd. 286 N. Y. 678). The cases cited by respondent objector involve proceedings to invalidate designating petitions and are not applicable.

In October, 1949, at the time of registration petitioner enrolled as a Democrat. Early in July, 1950, his claim to be a Democrat was challenged and on July 7th proceedings were initiated by the Democratic party county committee of Bronx County, and after a hearing a determination was made; thereafter a proceeding was duly instituted to cancel the enrollment. This proceeding [990]*990came on to be heard in this court and a decision and order was made and entered as hereafter more fully appears.

In the interim petitioner Walpin on July 18, 1950, caused to be filed a designating petition purporting to designate him as a candidate for nomination of the Democratic party for the office of member of Assembly, Third Assembly District, County of Bronx, to be voted for at the primary election to be held on August 22, 1950.

On July 21,1950, an objection was duly filed to said designating petition. On July 27th specifications were duly filed with the board of elections setting forth among other things that the petitioner was not validly enrolled as a member of the Democratic party.

Mr. Justice Rabin found that the said Walpin was not a duly enrolled Democrat and canceled his enrollment as a member of the Democratic party. (Matter of Mendelsohn v. Walpin, 197 Misc. 993.) The decision of Mr. Justice Rabin is controlling and is binding upon the parties and on this court. Accordingly as the petitioner, Walpin, is not such a person as is qualified to file a valid petition under subdivision 1 of section 137 of the Election Law, and the petition filed for the purpose of designating him as a candidate for a party nomination at the Democratic primary is invalid, the relief demanded by the petitioner must be and is in all respects denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 Misc. 989, 99 N.Y.S.2d 446, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walpin-v-heffernan-nysupct-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack