Walmor, Inc. v. Markel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walmor, Inc. v. Markel

240 A.D. 1007

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate subpoena reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. As a consequence of the adjournment without date, the proceeding lapsed; hence the court was without jurisdiction to issue the subpoenas. The proceeding could not be revived without notice to the judgment debtor. It is not claimed that such a notice was given. (Matter of Mancaruso v. Cuthbert, 224 App. Div. 754; Matter of Otten v. Stromeyer, No. 1, 228 id. 360; Nyamco Associates, Inc., v. King, 147 Misc. 904.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion to vacate subpoena reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. As a consequence of the adjournment without date, the proceeding lapsed; hence the court was without jurisdiction to issue the subpoenas. The proceeding could not be revived without notice to the judgment debtor. It is not claimed that such a notice was given. (Matter of Mancaruso v. Cuthbert, 224 App. Div. 754; Matter of Otten v. Stromeyer, No. 1, 228 id. 360; Nyamco Associates, Inc., v. King, 147 Misc. 904.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Walmor, Inc. v. Markel, 240 A.D. 1007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 1007 (Walmor, Inc. v. Markel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related