Wally Yammine v. Kim Ellen Lewiski, Individually, Hughes Watters, Askanase, LLC, Anthony Garcia, Damian W. Abreo, PNC Bank, National Association, Select Portfolio Serving, Inc.
This text of Wally Yammine v. Kim Ellen Lewiski, Individually, Hughes Watters, Askanase, LLC, Anthony Garcia, Damian W. Abreo, PNC Bank, National Association, Select Portfolio Serving, Inc. (Wally Yammine v. Kim Ellen Lewiski, Individually, Hughes Watters, Askanase, LLC, Anthony Garcia, Damian W. Abreo, PNC Bank, National Association, Select Portfolio Serving, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 15, 2024
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00052-CV
WALLY YAMMINE, Appellant V. KIM ELLEN LEWISKI, INDIVIDUALLY, HUGHES WATTERS, ASKANASE, LLC, ANTHONY GARCIA, DAMIAN W. ABREO, PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVING, INC., ET AL., Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-00009-C
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Carlyle Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III The clerk’s record in this case has not been filed. By order dated May 3, 2024,
we struck the affidavit of inability to pay filed in this case because the affidavit was
filed in a different trial court cause, not in this cause. We informed appellant he
could filed an affidavit in this appeal and the underlying cause, but our records do
not indicate appellant has done so. By letter dated June 27, 2024, we informed
appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the
clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, verification he (1) had either paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record, or (2) was
entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to
do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date,
appellant has not provided the required documentation nor otherwise corresponded
with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).
/Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE 230052F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
WALLY YAMMINE, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-23-00052-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-00009- C. KIM ELLEN LEWISKI, Opinion delivered by Justice INDIVIDUALLY, HUGHES Pedersen, III. Chief Justice Burns and WATTERS, ASKANASE, LLC, Justice Carlyle participating. ANTHONY GARCIA, DAMIAN W. ABREO, PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVING, INC., ET AL., Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.
Judgment entered July 15, 2024
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wally Yammine v. Kim Ellen Lewiski, Individually, Hughes Watters, Askanase, LLC, Anthony Garcia, Damian W. Abreo, PNC Bank, National Association, Select Portfolio Serving, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wally-yammine-v-kim-ellen-lewiski-individually-hughes-watters-askanase-texapp-2024.