Wally v. Cameron Industries, Inc.

179 A.D.2d 548, 579 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 481
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1992·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Petitioner failed to establish any of the exclusive grounds set forth in CPLR 7511 (b) for vacating an arbitration award. The arbitrator’s failure to take an oath constituted a technical irregularity waived by petitioner’s continued participation in the proceedings without objection (CPLR 7506 [f]; Matter of Institute of Intl. Educ. [Permanent Mission], 118 AD2d 433, 435-436; Morgan Guar. Trust Co. v Solow, 114 AD2d 818). And, by consenting to all extensions and submissions, petitioner waived his additional objection that the arbitrator and arbitration tribunal did not conduct the proceedings in accordance with the published rules of the forum. Finally, arbitration of this dispute, commenced by petitioner, was not precluded because petitioner raised a single claim under article 6 of the Labor Law. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wally v. Cameron Industries, Inc., 179 A.D.2d 548, 579 N.Y.S.2d 48, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 548 (Wally v. Cameron Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Squire v. Henschel
2 A.D.3d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance
309 A.D.2d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Wally v. General Arbitration Council of Textile & Apparel Industries
165 Misc. 2d 896 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)
In re the Arbitration between Cox & Mitchell
188 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)