Wallsworth v. M'Cullough

10 Johns. 93
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1813·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The warrant issued without authority, because it was not issued upon the complaint of the overseers of the poor, or either of them. The justice, acting ministerially in this case, was responsible for issuing the warrant, without the application required by the statute. The subsequent consent of one of the overseers, that the proceedings might go on, would not deprive the plaintiff of his action for the previous arrest upon a warrant irregularly issued.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallsworth v. M'Cullough, 10 Johns. 93 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

10 Johns. 93 (Wallsworth v. M'Cullough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Board of Police & Excise Commissioners v. Shulman
8 A.D. 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Rivenburgh v. Henness
4 Lans. 208 (New York Supreme Court, 1871)
Sprague v. Eccleston
1 Lans. 74 (New York Supreme Court, 1869)
Maguire v. Hughes
13 La. Ann. 281 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1858)