Walls v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walls v. State

852 So. 2d 954, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12814, 2003 WL 22014842

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 27, 2003

DocketNo. 4D03-2259

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 852 So. 2d 954 (Walls v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walls v. State, 852 So. 2d 954, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12814, 2003 WL 22014842 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wanas Walls appeals an order rendered by the circuit court, which summarily denied his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. At the time the trial court ruled on this motion, Walls had a final appeal pending in this court. The circuit court therefore lacked jurisdiction to enter the order. Its order is properly deemed a nullity. See Leonard v. State, 835 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 845 So.2d 891 (Fla.2003).

Accordingly, we vacate the circuit court’s order of April 15, 2003. On remand, we direct the circuit court to either dismiss the motion with leave to refile or stay proceedings on the motion pending resolution of appellant’s direct appeal and, thereafter, enter a new ruling on the motion. See Leonard; Perez v. State, 834 So.2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(en banc).

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Wanas Walls appeals an order rendered by the circuit court, which summarily denied his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. At the time the trial court ruled on this motion, Walls had a final appeal pending in this court. The circuit court therefore lacked jurisdiction to enter the order. Its order is properly deemed a nullity. See Leonard v. State, 835 So.2d 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 845 So.2d 891 (Fla.2003).

Accordingly, we vacate the circuit court’s order of April 15, 2003. On remand, we direct the circuit court to either dismiss the motion with leave to refile or stay proceedings on the motion pending resolution of appellant’s direct appeal and, thereafter, enter a new ruling on the motion. See Leonard; Perez v. State, 834 So.2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(en banc).

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

852 So. 2d 954, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12814, 2003 WL 22014842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walls-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack