Walls v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walls v. State

808 So. 2d 262, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1268, 2002 WL 460276

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 8, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-4526

StatusPublished

This text of 808 So. 2d 262 (Walls v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walls v. State, 808 So. 2d 262, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1268, 2002 WL 460276 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Jimmy L. Walls challenges the denial of his motion objecting to restitution costs. The trial court summarily denied the motion on the basis that Walls should have raised this issue on direct appeal.

We do not agree that errors in restitution orders are not cognizable in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) motions. See Amendments to Fla. R. of Crim. P. S. 111(e) & 3.800 & Fla. R. of App. P. 9.020(h), 9.140, & 9.600, 761 So.2d 1015, 1019 (Fla.2000). However, we affirm because Walls’ motion was untimely and facially insufficient.

Affirmed.

GREEN and KELLY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI