Walls v. Posner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walls v. Posner

25 A.D.2d 787, 271 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4459

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 787 (Walls v. Posner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walls v. Posner, 25 A.D.2d 787, 271 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 21, 1965, upon a jury verdict in his favor in the amount of $500. Jucfirmeni reversed, on the law and the faets, and new trial granted, with [788]*788costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order hereon, defendant shall serve arid file a written stipulation consenting to increase to $1,500 the amount of the verdict in plaintiff’s favor and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so increased and amended, is affirmed, with costs to appellant. In our opinion, the award was inadequate to the extent indicated.

Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 21, 1965, upon a jury verdict in his favor in the amount of $500. Jucfirmeni reversed, on the law and the faets, and new trial granted, with [788]*788costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order hereon, defendant shall serve arid file a written stipulation consenting to increase to $1,500 the amount of the verdict in plaintiff’s favor and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so increased and amended, is affirmed, with costs to appellant. In our opinion, the award was inadequate to the extent indicated.

Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 787, 271 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walls-v-posner-nyappdiv-1966.