Walls v. Merchants Fire Assurance Corp. of New York

206 N.C. 903
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 28, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee. Cubiam.

The case is controlled by the decision in Welch v. Ins. Co., 196 N. C., 546, 146 S. E., 216. There is no allegation that the New York Standard Mortgagee Clause was fraudulently omitted from the policy issued by the Royal Insurance Company of Liverpool, nor is there any evidence of a mutual mistake, or mistake on one side and fraud on the other. The appellant’s motion to nonsuit should have been allowed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walls v. Merchants Fire Assurance Corp. of New York, 206 N.C. 903 (N.C. 1934).

206 N.C. 903 (Walls v. Merchants Fire Assurance Corp. of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riddle v. Nelson
353 S.E.2d 866 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)