Walls v. Hicks (In re Hicks)

M.D. Florida

Walls v. Hicks (In re Hicks)

530 B.R. 921

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

DecidedMay 22, 2015

DocketCase No. 6:14-bk-07149-KSJ; Adversary No. 6:14-ap-00130-KSJ

StatusPublished

This text of 530 B.R. 921 (Walls v. Hicks (In re Hicks)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walls v. Hicks (In re Hicks), 530 B.R. 921 (Fla. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

FINAL JUDGMENT

Karen S. Jennemann, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

This adversary proceeding came on for trial on April 2, 2015, on the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, Martha Walls, seeking to determine dischargeability of certain debts of the Debtor/Defendant, Gary Robert Hick's, under 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(5) and 523(a)(15). Consistent with the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered contemporaneously, it is

ORDERED:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff, Martha Jeanette Walls, and against the Debtor/Defendant, Gary Robert Hicks.

2. The debt the Defendant owes to the Plaintiff for his failure to remit 10% of his military retirement pay to the Plaintiff between the entry of the Divorce Decree and his bankruptcy filing is not dis-chargeable pursuant to § 523(a)(15) of the Bankruptcy Code.

3. The appropriate state court is authorized to determine and issue judgment [923]*923for the exact amount of the nondis-chargeable debt due to the Plaintiff for the Defendant’s failure to remit 10% of his military retirement pay to the Plaintiff between the entry of the Divorce Decree and his bankruptcy filing.

4. The alimony debt is nondis-chargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5).

5. The debt for attorney’s fees, the marital residence debt, and “all remaining debt” in Paragraph 6(B) of the Divorce Decree is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15).

6. Plaintiffs award of 60% of the Defendant’s military retirement pay is not dischargeable because it is not a debt owed to the Plaintiff, but rather is the Plaintiffs sole and separate property.

7. Defendant’s direct liability to the third-party creditors relating to the marital residence debt and “all remaining debt” in Paragraph 6(B) of the Divorce Decree is discharged.

8. Defendant further has a continuing obligation to remit the Plaintiffs share of his military retirement pay to her as a constructive trustee.

ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI