Wallis v. Maddox
157 S.E.2d 456, 223 Ga. 626, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 637
Opinion
Under the decision in Hicks v. Maple Valley Corp., 223 Ga. 577, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed since the appellants’ brief failed to point out the places in the record showing this court to have jurisdiction of the appeal, the references to the record showing the errors specified, or the references necessary for a consideration thereof.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wallis v. Maddox, 157 S.E.2d 456, 223 Ga. 626, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 637 (Ga. 1967).
157 S.E.2d 456 (Wallis v. Maddox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bailey v. Smith
180 S.E.2d 356 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Law v. Smith
174 S.E.2d 893 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Bassett v. Smith
172 S.E.2d 407 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Clark v. Perrin
170 S.E.2d 236 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1969)