Wallis v. Luman

618 P.2d 1347, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 330
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 29, 1980
DocketNo. 5402
StatusPublished

This text of 618 P.2d 1347 (Wallis v. Luman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallis v. Luman, 618 P.2d 1347, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 330 (Wyo. 1980).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

The Court, after having considered the problem of improper and late filing of Docketing Statements, finds that there is here a violation of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P., as amended, which amendment was effective July 1, 1980 after notice to all members of the bar and ignorance of the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure is not an excuse, Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corporation, Wyo.1979, 598 P.2d 812, and further finds that a reasonable period of transition should be allowed to accustom the bench and bar to the requirements of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P.

Without establishing any precedent therefor in any future case, it is

ORDERED that appellee’s Motion to Dismiss be, and is, denied.

McCLINTOCK, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp.
598 P.2d 812 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
618 P.2d 1347, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallis-v-luman-wyo-1980.