Wallis v. Luman

618 P.2d 1347, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 330
Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 1980·No. No. 5402·Published

Opinion

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

The Court, after having considered the problem of improper and late filing of Docketing Statements, finds that there is here a violation of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P., as amended, which amendment was effective July 1, 1980 after notice to all members of the bar and ignorance of the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure is not an excuse, Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corporation, Wyo.1979, 598 P.2d 812, and further finds that a reasonable period of transition should be allowed to accustom the bench and bar to the requirements of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P.

Without establishing any precedent therefor in any future case, it is

ORDERED that appellee’s Motion to Dismiss be, and is, denied.

McCLINTOCK, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallis v. Luman, 618 P.2d 1347, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 330 (Wyo. 1980).

618 P.2d 1347 (Wallis v. Luman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp.
598 P.2d 812 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1979)