Wallis v. Luman
This text of 618 P.2d 1347 (Wallis v. Luman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
The Court, after having considered the problem of improper and late filing of Docketing Statements, finds that there is here a violation of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P., as amended, which amendment was effective July 1, 1980 after notice to all members of the bar and ignorance of the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure is not an excuse, Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corporation, Wyo.1979, 598 P.2d 812, and further finds that a reasonable period of transition should be allowed to accustom the bench and bar to the requirements of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P.
Without establishing any precedent therefor in any future case, it is
ORDERED that appellee’s Motion to Dismiss be, and is, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
618 P.2d 1347, 1980 Wyo. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallis-v-luman-wyo-1980.