Wallis v. Loubat

2 Denio 607
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinion

Bronson, C. J.

delivered an opinion in favor of affirming the decree appealed from, on the ground that Anderson had no authority from Loubat to make such a bargain as that set up by the appellant. He however stated that he did not intend to intimate a doubt but that the chancellor was right in the view which he had taken of the case.

Barlow, Hand and Wright, Senators, delivered opinions in favor of affirming the decree, upon the grounds taken by the chancellor.

Upon the question being put, Shall this decree be feversed ?” all the members of the court present who had heard the argument, to wit: The President, the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Jewett, and /$'enators Backus, Barlow, Beers, Bockee, Burnham, Chamberlain, Corning, Deyo, Hand, Johnson, Jones, Lott, Mitchell, Porter, Scovil,.Talcott, Varney and Wright (21) voted for affirming.

Decree affirmed.

[609]*609CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallis v. Loubat, 2 Denio 607 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

2 Denio 607 (Wallis v. Loubat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Foster v. Washington State Bar Ass'n
162 P.2d 261 (Washington Supreme Court, 1945)
In Re the Estate of Gilman
167 N.E. 437 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Latimer v. York Cotton Mills
44 S.E. 559 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1903)
Barkley v. New York Centrall & Hudson River Railroad
42 A.D. 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Elmore v. Johnson
21 L.R.A. 366 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1892)
Burnham v. Heselton
9 L.R.A. 90 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1890)
In re O'Neill
34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 599 (New York Supreme Court, 1882)
In re Niles
5 Daly 465 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1875)
Stearns v. Felker
28 Wis. 594 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1871)
Boardman v. Thompson
25 Iowa 487 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1868)
Nexsen v. Nexsen
3 Abb. Ct. App. 360 (New York Court of Appeals, 1865)
Brock v. Barnes
40 Barb. 521 (New York Supreme Court, 1863)
Cohen v. Wright
22 Cal. 293 (California Supreme Court, 1863)
Richardson v. Brooklyn City & Newtown Railroad
22 How. Pr. 368 (New York Supreme Court, 1862)
Waters v. Whittemore
22 Barb. 593 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)
Scobey v. Ross
5 Ind. 445 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1854)
Giles v. Halbert
5 How. Pr. 319 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Satterlee v. Frazer
2 Sandf. 141 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1848)