Wallis v. Loubat

New York Supreme Court

Wallis v. Loubat

2 Denio 607

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1845

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 2 Denio 607 (Wallis v. Loubat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallis v. Loubat, 2 Denio 607 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

Bronson, C. J.

delivered an opinion in favor of affirming the decree appealed from, on the ground that Anderson had no authority from Loubat to make such a bargain as that set up by the appellant. He however stated that he did not intend to intimate a doubt but that the chancellor was right in the view which he had taken of the case.

Barlow, Hand and Wright, Senators, delivered opinions in favor of affirming the decree, upon the grounds taken by the chancellor.

Upon the question being put, “ Shall this decree be feversed ?” all the members of the court present who had heard the argument, to wit: The President, the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Jewett, and /$'enators Backus, Barlow, Beers, Bockee, Burnham, Chamberlain, Corning, Deyo, Hand, Johnson, Jones, Lott, Mitchell, Porter, Scovil,.Talcott, Varney and Wright (21) voted for affirming.

Decree affirmed.

[609]*609CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson, C. J.

delivered an opinion in favor of affirming the decree appealed from, on the ground that Anderson had no authority from Loubat to make such a bargain as that set up by the appellant. He however stated that he did not intend to intimate a doubt but that the chancellor was right in the view which he had taken of the case.

Barlow, Hand and Wright, Senators, delivered opinions in favor of affirming the decree, upon the grounds taken by the chancellor.

Upon the question being put, “ Shall this decree be feversed ?” all the members of the court present who had heard the argument, to wit: The President, the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Jewett, and /$'enators Backus, Barlow, Beers, Bockee, Burnham, Chamberlain, Corning, Deyo, Hand, Johnson, Jones, Lott, Mitchell, Porter, Scovil,.Talcott, Varney and Wright (21) voted for affirming.

Decree affirmed.

[609]*609CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Denio 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallis-v-loubat-nysupct-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack