Wallis v. Fei Nei

Fifth Circuit

Wallis v. Fei Nei

230 F. 77, 144 C.C.A. 375, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 11, 1916

DocketNo. 2745

StatusPublished

This text of 230 F. 77 (Wallis v. Fei Nei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallis v. Fei Nei, 230 F. 77, 144 C.C.A. 375, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432 (5th Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

GRUBB, District Judge.

These appeals are not to he distinguished in their facts or the applicable law from the case of Wallis, Assistant Commissioner of Immigration, v. United States, on relation of Ng Sam and others, 230 Fed. 71, - C. C. A. -, just decided, and are governed by the ruling in that case.

The orders of the District Court involved in the direct appeals, making the writs absolute and discharging the relators, Fei Nei and Chung (or Chang) Jung, are reversed, and the cases remanded to the District Court, with directions to discharge the writs at relators’ costs, and the order involved in the cross-appeal of Ken Sew will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRUBB, District Judge.

These appeals are not to he distinguished in their facts or the applicable law from the case of Wallis, Assistant Commissioner of Immigration, v. United States, on relation of Ng Sam and others, 230 Fed. 71, - C. C. A. -, just decided, and are governed by the ruling in that case.

The orders of the District Court involved in the direct appeals, making the writs absolute and discharging the relators, Fei Nei and Chung (or Chang) Jung, are reversed, and the cases remanded to the District Court, with directions to discharge the writs at relators’ costs, and the order involved in the cross-appeal of Ken Sew will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 F. 77, 144 C.C.A. 375, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallis-v-fei-nei-ca5-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack