Wallis v. Cooper

23 N.E. 977, 123 Ind. 40, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 147
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 1890·No. No. 15,276·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The appellee was appointed administrator de bonis non of the estate of Catherine Wallis, deceased, by the clerk of the Gibson Circuit Court on the 14th day of September, 1889, and the letters and the bond were subsequently reported to the court for confirmation and approval. Over the objection of the appellant the appointment was confirmed. The appellant thereupon petitioned the court to appoint her the administrator of the estate of the decedent, but her petition was denied.

The circuit court has a wide discretion in matters concern[41] ing the appointment of administrators, and the appellate court will not control that discretion nor interfere with its exercise except where it has been abused. We think that in this instance there was no abuse of discretion, and that the circuit court wisely and justly exercised its authority.

Filed March 21, 1890.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallis v. Cooper, 23 N.E. 977, 123 Ind. 40, 1890 Ind. LEXIS 147 (Ind. 1890).

23 N.E. 977 (Wallis v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Ripa v. Lake Superior Court
43 N.E.2d 871 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1942)
Haughey v. Haughey
127 N.E. 454 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1920)
Diedrich v. Way
119 N.E. 223 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1918)
Studabaker v. Faylor
114 N.E. 772 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Holtz v. Mercantile Trust & Savings Co.
100 N.E. 398 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1913)
Curry v. Plessinger
96 N.E. 190 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Bentley v. Jarrell
84 N.E. 548 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)
Shrum v. Naugle
53 N.E. 243 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Bowen v. Stewart
26 N.E. 168 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)