Wallingsford v. City of Maplewood

414 S.W.3d 577, 2013 WL 5379671, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1101
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 24, 2013·No. No. ED 98975·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ellen Wallingsford (Wallingsford) appeals from the judgment in favor of the City of Maplewood and against Wallings-ford on her claims of hostile work environment and constructive discharge under the Missouri Human Rights Act. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallingsford v. City of Maplewood, 414 S.W.3d 577, 2013 WL 5379671, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1101 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

414 S.W.3d 577 (Wallingsford v. City of Maplewood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.