Wallingford Bd. of Education v. Local 1282, No. 32 18 65 (Apr. 21, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Wallingford Bd. of Education v. Local 1282, No. 32 18 65 (Apr. 21, 1992)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3781

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 21, 1992

DocketNo. 32 18 65

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3781 (Wallingford Bd. of Education v. Local 1282, No. 32 18 65 (Apr. 21, 1992)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallingford Bd. of Education v. Local 1282, No. 32 18 65 (Apr. 21, 1992), 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3781 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ARTICULATION The court articulates its decision to dismiss the plaintiff's application as follows:

1. The defendant is a voluntary association doing business in Connecticut.

2. Its presiding officer, secretary and treasurer are residents of Connecticut.

3. The officer's return in this case indicates that none of the three officers listed above were served.

4. Service on the Secretary of State would be appropriate only if "all of such officers are not residents of the state."

5. The court relied on CGS 52-57(e) to make the determination as to how service should be made against a voluntary association.

6. Case law to support this decision is found in:

Hyde v. Richards, 145 Conn. 24, 25-26, (1958);

Fitzsimmons v. International Assn. of Machinists, 125 Conn. 490 (1939);

City of New Haven v. Local 884, Council No. 4, 29 Conn. Sup. 289 (1971).

ANTHONY V. DeMAYO, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ARTICULATION The court articulates its decision to dismiss the plaintiff's application as follows:

1. The defendant is a voluntary association doing business in Connecticut.

2. Its presiding officer, secretary and treasurer are residents of Connecticut.

3. The officer's return in this case indicates that none of the three officers listed above were served.

4. Service on the Secretary of State would be appropriate only if "all of such officers are not residents of the state."

5. The court relied on CGS 52-57(e) to make the determination as to how service should be made against a voluntary association.

6. Case law to support this decision is found in:

Hyde v. Richards, 145 Conn. 24, 25-26, (1958);

Fitzsimmons v. International Assn. of Machinists, 125 Conn. 490 (1939);

City of New Haven v. Local 884, Council No. 4, 29 Conn. Sup. 289 (1971).

ANTHONY V. DeMAYO, JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallingford-bd-of-education-v-local-1282-no-32-18-65-apr-21-1992-connsuperct-1992.

Opinion

6. Case law to support this decision is found in:

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack