Walling v. W. G. Golebiewski, Inc.

Second Circuit

Walling v. W. G. Golebiewski, Inc.

142 F.2d 1015, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3580

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 6, 1944·No. No. 161·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is no different from that which we decided in Walling v. American Rolbal Co., 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 1003; and we need add nothing to what we there said. We then suggested that to require so many records to be taken from the office where they are kept, might impose an unreasonable inconvenience upon the employer, and that the district court might find it adequate relief to allow the Administrator or his assistants to examine them on the premises. That suggestion we repeat. The order will be affirmed; and, our mandate will be without prejudice to such an amendment to the order if the district court so decides.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is no different from that which we decided in Walling v. American Rolbal Co., 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 1003; and we need add nothing to what we there said. We then suggested that to require so many records to be taken from the office where they are kept, might impose an unreasonable inconvenience upon the employer, and that the district court might find it adequate relief to allow the Administrator or his assistants to examine them on the premises. That suggestion we repeat. The order will be affirmed; and, our mandate will be without prejudice to such an amendment to the order if the district court so decides.

Order affirmed.

Walling v. W. G. Golebiewski, Inc., 142 F.2d 1015, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3580 (2d Cir. 1944).

Pincite

142 F.2d 1015 (Walling v. W. G. Golebiewski, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related