Walling v. Trevor

Oregon Supreme Court

Walling v. Trevor

66 P. 234, 42 Or. 624, 1901 Ore. LEXIS 175

DecidedOctober 7, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 66 P. 234 (Walling v. Trevor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walling v. Trevor, 66 P. 234, 42 Or. 624, 1901 Ore. LEXIS 175 (Or. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Bean

delivered the opinion.

The notice of appeal in the above-entitled case bears the signatures of William Reid and T. B. Handley as attorneys for the appellant. Notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was served upon William Reid. At the hearing there was no appearance for the appellant, and Mr. Reid, in a letter to the clerk, says that he is not and never was attorney for the appellant. In view of this fact, it is ordered that notice of the motion to dismiss be served upon Mr. Handley, and further consideration of the motion will be continued.

Continued; Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Bean

delivered the opinion.

The notice of appeal in the above-entitled case bears the signatures of William Reid and T. B. Handley as attorneys for the appellant. Notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was served upon William Reid. At the hearing there was no appearance for the appellant, and Mr. Reid, in a letter to the clerk, says that he is not and never was attorney for the appellant. In view of this fact, it is ordered that notice of the motion to dismiss be served upon Mr. Handley, and further consideration of the motion will be continued.

Continued; Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 P. 234, 42 Or. 624, 1901 Ore. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walling-v-trevor-or-1901.