Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway

Supreme Court

Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway

329 U.S. 696, 67 S. Ct. 85

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway. Read the opinion of the Court — 330 U.S. 158 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1946·No. No. 335; No. 336·Published

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and

On petition for writ of certi-orari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are [697]*697granted.

Solicitor General McGrath and William S. Tyson for petitioner. Edwin F. Hunt, Walton Whitwell and Wm. H. Swiggart for respondent in No. 335. Leonard A. Pierce and E. Spencer Miller for respondent in No. 336. Harold B. Wahl filed a brief for the Jacksonville Terminal Co., as amicus curiae, opposing the petitions.

Reported below: No. 335,155 F. 2d 1016; No. 336,155 F. 2d 215.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and

On petition for writ of certi-orari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are [697]*697granted.

Solicitor General McGrath and William S. Tyson for petitioner. Edwin F. Hunt, Walton Whitwell and Wm. H. Swiggart for respondent in No. 335. Leonard A. Pierce and E. Spencer Miller for respondent in No. 336. Harold B. Wahl filed a brief for the Jacksonville Terminal Co., as amicus curiae, opposing the petitions.

Reported below: No. 335,155 F. 2d 1016; No. 336,155 F. 2d 215.

Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, 329 U.S. 696, 67 S. Ct. 85 (1946).

Pincite

329 U.S. 696 (Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related