Home/Supreme Court/Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway

Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway

329 U.S. 696, 67 S. Ct. 85
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 14, 1946
DocketNo. 335; No. 336
StatusPublished

This text of 329 U.S. 696 (Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walling v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway, 329 U.S. 696, 67 S. Ct. 85 (1946).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit; and

On petition for writ of certi-orari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are [697]*697granted.

Solicitor General McGrath and William S. Tyson for petitioner. Edwin F. Hunt, Walton Whitwell and Wm. H. Swiggart for respondent in No. 335. Leonard A. Pierce and E. Spencer Miller for respondent in No. 336. Harold B. Wahl filed a brief for the Jacksonville Terminal Co., as amicus curiae, opposing the petitions.

Reported below: No. 335,155 F. 2d 1016; No. 336,155 F. 2d 215.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walling v. Portland Terminal Co.
155 F.2d 215 (First Circuit, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 U.S. 696, 67 S. Ct. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walling-v-nashville-chattanooga-st-louis-railway-scotus-1946.