Wallin v. Buzzell

384 F. App'x 267
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2010·No. No. 10-1154·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stephen F. Buzzell and Kimberly B. Buzzell appeal the district court’s order dismissing them motion for reconsideration of its remand order for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(c), (d) (2006). Because the district court’s remand to state court of an unlawful detainer proceeding filed under Virginia law was premised on its lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the district court’s order is not subject to review. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28, 116 S.Ct. 494, 133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallin v. Buzzell, 384 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2010).

384 F. App'x 267 (Wallin v. Buzzell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca
516 U.S. 124 (Supreme Court, 1995)