Wallerick v. Greiner
This text of 49 Iowa 694 (Wallerick v. Greiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants do not claim that they have established that decedent was insane, but they claim that fraud and undue influence were practiced upon him in his suffering and weak condition. The evidence shows that at the time of the execution of the deed decedent was very aged, and was suffering from a very painful disease. We unite, however, in the opinion that the evidence does not show that any fraud or undue influence was practiced upon him by the defendant, or that any advantage was taken of his condition. A review of the evidence in detail would subserve no useful purpose. We have no hesitancy in holding that the judgment of the court below should be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Iowa 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallerick-v-greiner-iowa-1878.