Waller v. WATSON-WESLEY COLEMAN
Opinion
ORDER
Sharolynne Waller (hereinafter, “Appellant”) appeals pro se from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her nine count petition against Denise J. Watson-Wesley and White, Ovletrea & Watson, L.C. Appellant raises eight points on appeal challenging several alleged procedural errors committed by the trial court.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
272 S.W.3d 328 (Waller v. WATSON-WESLEY COLEMAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.