Waller v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Waller v. United States

88 F.2d 1021, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3357

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 9, 1937

DocketNo. 7630

StatusPublished

This text of 88 F.2d 1021 (Waller v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waller v. United States, 88 F.2d 1021, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3357 (6th Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant being the person named in the indictment under which the removal proceedings were instituted, and it appearing from the proofs offered on the application for the writ of habeas corpus that there was probable cause to believe that the appellant had committed the offenses charged in the indictment, it is ordered that the order vacating the writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition therefor be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant being the person named in the indictment under which the removal proceedings were instituted, and it appearing from the proofs offered on the application for the writ of habeas corpus that there was probable cause to believe that the appellant had committed the offenses charged in the indictment, it is ordered that the order vacating the writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition therefor be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 F.2d 1021, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 3357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-v-united-states-ca6-1937.