Waller v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Waller v. Taylor

42 Ala. 297

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

JUDGE, J.

The opinion of the chancellor shows conclusively that the bill in this case is multifarious ; and for this reason it was rightfully dismissed. — Tasker v. Small, 3 Mylne & Craig, 63 ; Mole v. Smith, Jac. 490 ; Robertown v. G. W. Railway Co., 10 Simons, 314; Wood v. White, 4 Mylne & Craig, 460 ; Bean v. Bean's Adm'r, 37 Ala. 17 ; Story’s Eq. Pl., Sec. 272.

Decree affirmed, and appellant must pay the costs of this court.

Bybd, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGE, J.

The opinion of the chancellor shows conclusively that the bill in this case is multifarious ; and for this reason it was rightfully dismissed. — Tasker v. Small, 3 Mylne & Craig, 63 ; Mole v. Smith, Jac. 490 ; Robertown v. G. W. Railway Co., 10 Simons, 314; Wood v. White, 4 Mylne & Craig, 460 ; Bean v. Bean's Adm'r, 37 Ala. 17 ; Story’s Eq. Pl., Sec. 272.

Decree affirmed, and appellant must pay the costs of this court.

Bybd, J., not sitting.

Waller v. Taylor, 42 Ala. 297 (Ala. 1868).

Pincite

42 Ala. 297 (Waller v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related