Waller v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Waller v. Taylor

42 Ala. 297

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1868

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 42 Ala. 297 (Waller v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waller v. Taylor, 42 Ala. 297 (Ala. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGE, J.

The opinion of the chancellor shows conclusively that the bill in this case is multifarious ; and for this reason it was rightfully dismissed. — Tasker v. Small, 3 Mylne & Craig, 63 ; Mole v. Smith, Jac. 490 ; Robertown v. G. W. Railway Co., 10 Simons, 314; Wood v. White, 4 Mylne & Craig, 460 ; Bean v. Bean's Adm'r, 37 Ala. 17 ; Story’s Eq. Pl., Sec. 272.

Decree affirmed, and appellant must pay the costs of this court.

Bybd, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGE, J.

The opinion of the chancellor shows conclusively that the bill in this case is multifarious ; and for this reason it was rightfully dismissed. — Tasker v. Small, 3 Mylne & Craig, 63 ; Mole v. Smith, Jac. 490 ; Robertown v. G. W. Railway Co., 10 Simons, 314; Wood v. White, 4 Mylne & Craig, 460 ; Bean v. Bean's Adm'r, 37 Ala. 17 ; Story’s Eq. Pl., Sec. 272.

Decree affirmed, and appellant must pay the costs of this court.

Bybd, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Ala. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-v-taylor-ala-1868.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack