Waller v. State

774 So. 2d 822, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16885, 2000 WL 1872665
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Waller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2302
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2000·No. No. 3D00-3399·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alvin Repress Waller appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We have taken judicial notice of this court’s file in defendant-appellant Waller’s earlier appeal, Waller v. State, 752 So.2d 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). The issues in the present appeal are the same issues which were rejected by this court in defendant’s earlier appeal. That earlier ruling is dis-positive of the present appeal.

We would point out to the defendant that his reliance on Mathews v. State, 574 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), is misplaced. That case discusses the predicate offenses that are needed for an adjudication as a habitual violent felony offender. In this case, defendant was adjudicated a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. Thus, the Mathews decision has no application to his case. The State demonstrated in the prior appeal that the defendant qualifies as a habitual felony offender.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waller v. State, 774 So. 2d 822, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16885, 2000 WL 1872665 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

774 So. 2d 822 (Waller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathews v. State
574 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Waller v. State
752 So. 2d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)