Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Waller v. Hardin

Waller v. Hardin

157 S.E. 889, 43 Ga. App. 16, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 165
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 31, 1931
Docket20770
StatusPublished

This text of 157 S.E. 889 (Waller v. Hardin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waller v. Hardin, 157 S.E. 889, 43 Ga. App. 16, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no error in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the one special ground of the motion for a new trial. See Martin v. Munroe, 130 Ga. 79 (60 S. E. 253).

2. The evidence amply supports the finding of the jury, the verdict has the [17]*17approval of the judge who tried the ease, and this court is powerless to interfere.

Decided March 31, 1931. Judgment affirmed. Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. 17. M. Smith, Carlisle Cobb, for plaintiffs in error. O, J. Tolnds, Twit c& Brown, Hamilton McWhorter, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Munroe
60 S.E. 253 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 889, 43 Ga. App. 16, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-v-hardin-gactapp-1931.