Waller v. Hardin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Waller v. Hardin

157 S.E. 889, 43 Ga. App. 16, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 165

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 31, 1931·No. 20770·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no error in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the one special ground of the motion for a new trial. See Martin v. Munroe, 130 Ga. 79 (60 S. E. 253).

2. The evidence amply supports the finding of the jury, the verdict has the [17]*17approval of the judge who tried the ease, and this court is powerless to interfere.

Decided March 31, 1931. Judgment affirmed. Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. 17. M. Smith, Carlisle Cobb, for plaintiffs in error. O, J. Tolnds, Twit c& Brown, Hamilton McWhorter, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no error in the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the one special ground of the motion for a new trial. See Martin v. Munroe, 130 Ga. 79 (60 S. E. 253).

2. The evidence amply supports the finding of the jury, the verdict has the [17]*17approval of the judge who tried the ease, and this court is powerless to interfere.

Decided March 31, 1931. Judgment affirmed. Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. 17. M. Smith, Carlisle Cobb, for plaintiffs in error. O, J. Tolnds, Twit c& Brown, Hamilton McWhorter, contra.

Waller v. Hardin, 157 S.E. 889, 43 Ga. App. 16, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 165 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

157 S.E. 889 (Waller v. Hardin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related