Waller v. Gwin

Alabama Court of Appeals

Waller v. Gwin

149 So. 927, 25 Ala. App. 693

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 3, 1933

Docket7 Div. 926.

StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 927 (Waller v. Gwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waller v. Gwin, 149 So. 927, 25 Ala. App. 693 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

BBICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is upon the record proper. The assignments of error are predicated upon adverse rulings of the court (1) in sustaining demurrers to appellants’ plea in abatement; (2) in overruling appellants’ demurrer to the complaint which consisted of one count only.

From the view we take of this case, it needs no extended discussion, as the points of decision here involved have each been decided adversely to appellants’ insistence in the case of James et al. v. Harry Kitzinger & Co., 13 Ala. App. 448, 68 So. 582, in which is cited the case of Jaffe v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 7 Ala. App. 206, 60 So. 966.

. The rulings of the court complained of were without error; therefore the judgment from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI