Waller v. Galter

31 F. Supp. 520, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 163, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3638
District Court, N.D. Illinois·Decided January 8, 1940·No. No. 655·Published

Opinion

HOLLY, District Judge.

On the authority of Luckett v. Delpark, 270 U.S. 496, 46 S.Ct. -397, 70 L.Ed. 703, and The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Company, 228 U.S. 22, 33 S.Ct. 410, 57 L. Ed. 716, defendant’s motion to dismiss must be denied. Plaintiff is not here asking the court to set aside the contract. Instead he avers that the contract had been terminated prior to the commencement of the suit and prays for an injunction to restrain infringement. I am of the opinion that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waller v. Galter, 31 F. Supp. 520, 44 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 163, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3638 (N.D. Ill. 1940).

31 F. Supp. 520 (Waller v. Galter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.
228 U.S. 22 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.
270 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court, 1926)