Waller v. Crawford

6 Misc. 3d 44
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Misc. 3d 44 (Waller v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waller v. Crawford, 6 Misc. 3d 44 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

[45]*45Order unanimously reversed without costs and plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar granted on condition that plaintiff file a notice of trial within 30 days of the date of the order hereon; otherwise order affirmed without costs.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The record establishes that the action had been placed on the trial calendar. Thereafter, defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted. However, said motion for summary judgment was subsequently vacated upon reconsideration by the court below. Whereas Uniform Civil Rules for the New York City Civil Court (22 NYCRR) § 208.17 is silent as to the procedures to be followed in order to have the action placed once again on the trial calendar after an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the action has been vacated, plaintiff should have diligently filed a new notice of trial to restore the action to the trial calendar. However, in the absence of any prejudice to defendant, plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the calendar is granted.

Aronin, J.P, Patterson and Golia, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Misc. 3d 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-v-crawford-nyappterm-2004.