WALLER v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA

District Court, M.D. Georgia·Decided July 24, 2024·No. 5:23-cv-00232·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

SHANNON WALLER JR., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-232 (MTT) ) BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE ) UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF ) GEORGIA, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER No later than July 31, 2024, Plaintiff Shannon Waller, Jr. is ORDERED to amend paragraph 166 of his second amended complaint (Doc. 37) to state the specific Title of the ADA under which he is suing Houston Healthcare System, Inc. and Houston Hospitals, Inc. Waller shall amend the addendum clause of his second amended complaint to state specifically the relief he seeks for each cause of action he asserts. See, in this regard, Silberman v. Miami Dade Transit, 927 F.3d 1123, 1134 (11th Cir. 2019) (“[A] § 504 violation [typically] entitles a plaintiff only to injunctive relief … To get damages … a plaintiff must clear an additional hurdle: he must prove that the entity that he has sued engaged in intentional discrimination, which requires a showing of ‘deliberate indifference.’”); Houston v. Marod Supermarkets, Inc., 733 F.3d 1323, 1329 (11th Cir. 2013) (“[I]njunctive relief … is the only form of relief available to plaintiffs suing under Title III of the ADA.”). Any further amendment shall require leave of court. SO ORDERED, this 24th day of July, 2024. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALLER v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, (M.D. Ga. 2024).

WALLER v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA (WALLER v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joe Houston v. Marod Supermarkets, Inc.
733 F.3d 1323 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
Charles Silberman v. Miami Dade Transit
927 F.3d 1123 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)