Waller, Pet v. Warren
This text of Waller, Pet v. Warren (Waller, Pet v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
WALLER CORPORATION, : No. 99 WM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : WARREN PLAZA, INC., : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2016, the Applications for Leave to File Reply
are GRANTED. The Bill of Costs and the Application for Further Costs and Attorneys’
Fees are GRANTED, to the extent they seek recognition of Petitioner’s right to recover
counsel fees. This matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Washington
County to calculate the amount of counsel fees to be awarded. See 73 P.S. §512(b)
(providing that “the substantially prevailing party in any proceeding to recover any
payment under [the Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act] shall be awarded a
reasonable attorney fee”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Waller, Pet v. Warren, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-pet-v-warren-pa-2016.