Waller-Lee v. Lee
This text of 486 S.W.3d 928 (Waller-Lee v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Kevin Lee appeals from the judgment dissolving his marriage, claiming that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction, that the division of marital property was erroneous and that the court erred in accepting his wife’s consent to and waiver of conflict of interest regarding Lee’s counsel.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 S.W.3d 928, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 151, 2016 WL 720550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-lee-v-lee-moctapp-2016.