Waller Corp. v. Warren Plaza, Inc., Pet
108 A.3d 29, 630 Pa. 648, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 114
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 21, 2015
Docket349 WAL 2014 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 108 A.3d 29 (Waller Corp. v. Warren Plaza, Inc., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Waller Corp. v. Warren Plaza, Inc., Pet, 108 A.3d 29, 630 Pa. 648, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 114 (Pa. 2015).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Should Warren’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal be granted because there are conflicting Pennsylvania Superior Court opinions about whether a good faith refusal to pay a contractor or subcontractor is or is not a factor to be considered when a court is deciding whether to award attorney fees under the Contractor Subcontractor Payment Act which creates uncertainty affecting thousands of businesses in the Commonwealth?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
International Management Consultants v. Sea-z
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 A.3d 29, 630 Pa. 648, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-corp-v-warren-plaza-inc-pet-pa-2015.