Wallen v. Huff
This text of 1 Thompson 21 (Wallen v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No bill of review lies in a Chancery Court or in this Court to review a decision of this Court.
Decree affirmed.
A bill of review will not lie in the Supreme Court upon a decree rendered there. Cox and Catron v. Breedlove et al., 2 Yerg. 499. (Craighead & White, special JJ. Peck, J., dissenting). Wilson v. Wilson, 10 Yerg. 200. Nor will a rehearing of a cause in the Supreme Court be granted at a term subsequent to final decree, although the cause was retained in the Supreme Court for the purpose of taking an account. Overton v. Bigelow, 10 Yerg. 48. See also Craig v. Buchannan, 1 Yerg.141.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Thompson 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallen-v-huff-tenn-1847.