Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1998 WL 646637
Opinion
The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission is reversed. The record demonstrates that the isolated incident employee is charged with committing “does not evince that type of willful or substantial disregard of the employer’s interests which rises to the level of misconduct as defined in Section [622]*622443.036(26)[, Florida Statutes].” Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Grossman v. J.C. Penney Co.2071, 689 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1998 WL 646637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
717 So. 2d 621 (Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc.
637 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Grossman v. JC PENNEY CO. 2071
689 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)