Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
This text of 717 So. 2d 621 (Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission is reversed. The record demonstrates that the isolated incident employee is charged with committing “does not evince that type of willful or substantial disregard of the employer’s interests which rises to the level of misconduct as defined in Section [622]*622443.036(26)[, Florida Statutes].” Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Grossman v. J.C. Penney Co.2071, 689 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1998 WL 646637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walled-v-publix-super-markets-inc-fladistctapp-1998.