Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1998 WL 646637
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 23, 1998
DocketNo. 98-1081
StatusPublished

This text of 717 So. 2d 621 (Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walled v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1998 WL 646637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission is reversed. The record demonstrates that the isolated incident employee is charged with committing “does not evince that type of willful or substantial disregard of the employer’s interests which rises to the level of misconduct as defined in Section [622]*622443.036(26)[, Florida Statutes].” Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc., 637 So.2d 269, 270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Grossman v. J.C. Penney Co.2071, 689 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. Sally Beauty Co., Inc.
637 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Grossman v. JC PENNEY CO. 2071
689 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 So. 2d 621, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11968, 1998 WL 646637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walled-v-publix-super-markets-inc-fladistctapp-1998.