Wallbrecht v. Ingram

239 U.S. 625, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 473, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1407
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 25, 1915
DocketNo. 549
StatusPublished

This text of 239 U.S. 625 (Wallbrecht v. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallbrecht v. Ingram, 239 U.S. 625, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 473, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1407 (1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2), 212 U. S. 112, 118; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Overton v. Oklahoma, 235 U. S. 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 2)
212 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Overton v. Oklahoma
235 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 U.S. 625, 36 S. Ct. 162, 60 L. Ed. 473, 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallbrecht-v-ingram-scotus-1915.