Wallack Bros. v. J.A.L., Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Wallack Bros. v. J.A.L., Inc.

256 A.2d 628, 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 459, 1968 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 236

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedDecember 20, 1968

DocketFile No. CV 6-683-34922

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.2d 628 (Wallack Bros. v. J.A.L., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wallack Bros. v. J.A.L., Inc., 256 A.2d 628, 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 459, 1968 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 236 (Colo. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From the record before ns it affirmatively appears that the defendants have failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the plaintiff from the judgment of the sixth Circuit Court. Accordingly, under authority contained in Practice Book § 696, specifically applicable to our appellate procedures under the provisions of Practice Book § 1023, on our own motion we set aside the judgment below and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment sustaining the appeal and that costs be taxed against the defendants and with further direction that judgment by default be entered against both defendants.

It is so ordered.

Dearington, Kinmonth and Macdonald, Js., participated in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

From the record before ns it affirmatively appears that the defendants have failed to defend with proper diligence against the appeal of the plaintiff from the judgment of the sixth Circuit Court. Accordingly, under authority contained in Practice Book § 696, specifically applicable to our appellate procedures under the provisions of Practice Book § 1023, on our own motion we set aside the judgment below and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment sustaining the appeal and that costs be taxed against the defendants and with further direction that judgment by default be entered against both defendants.

It is so ordered.

Dearington, Kinmonth and Macdonald, Js., participated in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.2d 628, 5 Conn. Cir. Ct. 459, 1968 Conn. Cir. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallack-bros-v-jal-inc-connappct-1968.